Apr 27, 2020
Posted on Apr 27, 2020 in Media Reports, National Listings, New Submissions, The Globe and Mail
It took a pandemic: Why systemic deficiencies in long-term care facilities pose such a danger to our seniors
Kathy Tomlinson and Grant Robertson, The Globe and Mail
At the long-term care home where Edna Tutor worked, she was so overwhelmed by the demands of the job that sometimes she didn’t have time to wash her hands. At another facility, with a revolving door of caregivers, Julieta Padilla feared for the aging residents.
“Things should be made better,” Ms. Padilla said. “Not for us, but for those old people in the nursing home. We can run away, but the people there cannot run away.”
These are frustrated pleas for help – from care providers who are speaking out about grim realities they encounter every day.
The pandemic ravaging Canada’s long-term care facilities is exposing how elderly residents are “sitting ducks” for catching deadly infections, even in the best of times, according to people who work in the sector, partly because of systemic deficiencies that have festered for years.
Because care homes have been hit so hard by the virus, there are pressing concerns about how and why their infection-control practices were sorely lacking before the pandemic hit. The Globe and Mail put those questions to numerous caregivers and their representatives, as well as seniors’ advocates, infectious-disease specialists, representatives for the facilities and their staffing agencies.
Most pointed to serious, chronic shortcomings – causing perpetual disease and death among frail residents – largely ignored by governments, until now.
“It took a pandemic for them to realize we were speaking the truth and the alarm that we were sending was not false,” said Miranda Ferrier, president of the Canadian Support Workers Association, whose members work in nursing and retirement homes.
“I hate to say it, but this happens all the time in long-term care. It is constant. Every year, we have [flu] outbreaks.”
“There is always a problem, when there is an illness in the homes,” said Jane Meadus, staff lawyer with the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly in Toronto, who pointed out that seniors in care facilities are older, and more vulnerable, than ever.
“But, they are certainly not keeping up with the staffing,” she said. “There doesn’t seem to be the ability to protect people who are living there. They are sitting ducks.”
As the deaths mount from COVID-19, the long-standing problems have been laid bare for policy makers. Last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged that the country is “failing” its elders. “If you’re angry, frustrated, scared, you’re right to feel this way,” he said. Ontario Premier Doug Ford was visibly shaken before revealing that his 95-year-old mother-in-law had tested positive for COVID-19, inside a long-term care facility.
Several people in the sector said the biggest problem is severe staff shortages, which make it difficult to protect residents from myriad infections, including flus that sweep through entire units, which can be fatal for seniors.
Those illnesses are regularly brought into facilities by part-time or casual caregivers, who are coming and going all the time to make up for the dearth of regular staff.
The Globe interviewed half a dozen of those caregivers, including Ms. Padilla, a personal support worker, who said she was a part-timer responsible for cleaning and dressing up to a dozen ailing residents at a time, at a Toronto facility.
“There is a [staff] shortage. And then someone new is coming … and tomorrow someone else is coming,” said Ms. Padilla, 52, who quit that job recently. “There are changes every moment … it is so exhausting.”
She and other workers requested that The Globe not identify the facilities they worked at.
Some said casual caregivers go into work even when they feel ill, because they don’t have paid sick leave and need the money. They typically work in more than one facility and travel back and forth on public transit, which makes them vulnerable to picking up and spreading illness.
“If you don’t go to work when you are sick, you just get replaced and you lose the hours,” said Charisse Castillo, an Ontario caregiver who has worked in long-term care. She said she didn’t go in sick, but knew others who did – although they weren’t supposed to.
“It’s really unfair to the elderly,” she said. “When there is flu outbreak, they just shut down the floor … but the staff are still working on that floor in the nursing home, then going to another one, for another shift. It happened many times like that before.”
Victor Leung, medical director of infection prevention and control for Providence Health Care, which provides long-term care in Vancouver, said having caregivers with no job security working at several homes is an obvious weakness.
“We know health care workers go to work when they are sick … and you increase the risk,” Dr. Leung said. “Most of the time, they will work at multiple places.”
Thousands of personal support workers actually work for outside staffing agencies, hired by facilities that can’t recruit enough of their own staff, or brought in by families worried about loved ones not getting enough attention.
They are the lowest-paid caregivers, who sometimes make not much more than minimum wage. The agencies they work for charge up to $40 an hour for their services.
Several told The Globe that they are running flat out and barely have time to look after the seniors adequately, let alone wash their hands and change their gloves, which are sometimes rationed or in short supply. Most said they didn’t wear gowns or masks before COVID-19, even during other outbreaks, unlike staff in hospitals.
“You have to do everything fast,” said Ms. Padilla, who said she often didn’t have time to practise proper hygiene.
“How can you wash a bum fast? You are running out of time and you have to do it fast and it is hard … because every minute of every hour you have to utilize.”
The most recent data from Statistics Canada show more than 1,545 residents died in long-term care homes in 2018 from communicable diseases, including the flu, which amounts to almost five deaths a day. (Data exclude Quebec, as comparable statistics from that province were not available). More than half of those deaths were in Ontario, a 30-per-cent increase from 10 years ago.
Meanwhile, warnings about serious deficiencies in long-term care go back more than a decade.
Though the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic, which killed 44 people in Canada, didn’t victimize long-term care homes the way other diseases have, the foreshadowing of today’s problems with COVID-19 were definitely there.
Federal SARS Commission investigators could see how exposed long-term care facilities would be if the disease had reached them, particularly given the havoc seasonal flu wreaks on such homes each year.
In the fall of 2005, with the commission in the middle of completing its report, Toronto’s Seven Oaks Long-Term Care Home was hit with an outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease, a bacterial pneumonia that infected at least 135 people, including 70 residents, 39 staff, 21 visitors and five people who lived or worked nearby. Twenty-three residents died.
The SARS Commission saw that outbreak as a warning, and added a chapter to its report, saying the tragedy “showed the bad side of Ontario’s response to SARS,” and putting the blame on “systemic problems that remain unfixed.”
That criticism apparently went unheeded by governments. COVID-19 has also hit Seven Oaks hard. Close to 100 cases have been reported there, including more than a dozen from staff. Two dozen residents have died.
Mario Possamai, a senior adviser on the SARS Commission from 2003 to 2007, said the most critical step in protecting residents of long-term care homes is to make certain the workers at those facilities don’t get sick.
“If you protect the health workers, you protect the residents,” Mr. Possamai told The Globe.
That means facilities must be properly stocked, he said, with N95 respirator masks, gloves, face shields and other equipment – not caught off guard when a virus hits, as so many have been – and gear deployed under the same rigid standards used in hospitals.
“One of the unfortunate things is that workers in long-term care facilities have been seen as the poor cousins of the health care community, when in fact, they should be as protected as nurses in ICU,” Mr. Possamai said.
He compares the spread of disease inside a long-term care home with that of the cruise ships that fell victim to COVID-19, where enclosed spaces became hard to defend once the virus found a way in.
Another problem contributing to deaths in long-term care, which was flagged by several people The Globe talked to, is the facilities themselves, with two to four seniors in a room, shared bathrooms, nowhere to isolate those who are ill and large communal dining rooms.
“They are four at a table and one is coughing and one is sniffing,” said Ms. Tutor, 50, who worked in long-term care a year ago, in Toronto, for an agency. She earned $15 an hour.
“Oh my God, it is hard. So very prone to the spread of a virus, or whatever it might be … we need more staff in the long-term care, so they have time to wash their hands.”
Ms. Tutor described how she had just an hour in the morning to get eight residents up, cleaned and dressed – including those who objected – then down the hall for breakfast, so they could all socialize, in the large dining room.
“But that doesn’t make sense in long-term care,” she said. “Because socializing doesn’t work any more. Many of them just close their eyes and sleep and not talk to each other. Very sad.”
Figures from the Public Health Agency of Canada show that there were 596 reported flu outbreaks, just this season, in long-term care facilities nationwide, a 20-per-cent increase over last year. Those figures do not include the devastation from COVID-19.
The lack of a vaccine is one factor that makes COVID-19 much more serious that the flu. However, federal data show flu viruses are also deadly threats to seniors, including those who are vaccinated. They are inoculated at higher rates than any other group, but the flu vaccine is only 18-per-cent effective at their age.
But the federal agency says reported flu cases dropped in the past month – to the lowest level on record – attributed partly to “social-distancing measures implemented in recent weeks,” which suggests better infection-control practices could also prevent flu deaths in long-term care.
Some caregivers told The Globe that their working conditions are now better than ever, in some respects, since pandemic restrictions were put in place, requiring them to work in only one long-term care facility and providing them with more personal protective equipment.
“We care staff understand the severity of the virus, because even with the regular influenza, we lose residents who can’t overcome it,” said Bing Nabor, who works in a B.C. facility with no COVID-19 cases.
“I am grateful that now they are trying everything they can to slow down the spread.”
Even so, at least one personal support worker in Ontario has died from COVID-19, and dozens more are walking off the job, according to their association, because it is not worth the risk of catching the virus – accelerating an exodus that was already causing alarm.
A 2018 survey of members by the Ontario Personal Support Workers Association, found that one third of 13,427 members questioned had quit jobs recently, 63 per cent of them citing “burnout” as the reason. Another 22 per cent were considering leaving.
Now, the need is more urgent than ever for workers such as Jazer Montillano, who offered to work in a Toronto facility that has several COVID-19 cases.
“On the first day, I was thinking of walking off, you know. When I entered the place, someone died,” Mr. Montillano said. “There is no guarantee people will come for their shift,” he said. “On my second day, I worked 16 hours because no one came for the night shift.”
An agency called Plan A Long Term Care Staffing and Recruitment is one that provides casual workers to Ontario long-term care facilities. Before the pandemic, it says it had 159 facility clients tapping its pool of caregivers. Now, it has 345.
In the face of soaring demand, the agency is losing recruits. Founder Sheri Tomchick said her labour pool, including some 600 personal support workers who make $22 an hour, is now 35-per-cent smaller than before the crisis.
“I’ve been saying ‘We need a long-term care staffing strategy’ for years,” Ms. Tomchick said. “COVID-19 is going to show us exactly what needs to be done to strengthen this sector in the future.”
Several leaders in the health sector were sounding alarm bells about deficient staffing and facilities, before the pandemic hit.
Earlier this year, the Ontario Long Term Care Association, the largest representative of facilities in Canada, told the province in a budget submission that “80% of long-term care homes are having difficulty filling shifts,” while plans to renovate and expand facilities are stalled, caught in red tape.
The association declined The Globe’s request for an interview, but sent a statement saying its members have a continuing “human resources emergency,” caused in part by a “complicated” government funding formula for frontline workers that is “limited” and “unstable.”
In 2016, an association for infectious-disease professionals said in a report that 70 per cent of communicable diseases in health care facilities are preventable. However, Infection Prevention and Control Canada said efforts have been “deficient in the essential resources and components required to be effective.”
Three years before that, the Public Health Agency of Canada put out recommendations for stopping disease spread, including “single rooms with a private toilet” and separate sinks for patients and staff – a setup many long-term care homes don’t have – and “sufficient” personal protective equipment to “maximize protection.”
It also stressed that workers “should stay away from work when infectious with a communicable disease.”
There are other possible solutions to consider, once the current pandemic subsides. Mr. Possamai, from the SARS Commission, said provinces should overhaul long-term care facilities, to upgrade the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems with similar virus-scrubbing technology that hospitals use.
“That could have real impact,” he said. “I don’t think that you would have this level of outbreak if things like HVAC were to [hospital] levels.”
Several people that The Globe interviewed said they hope the damage COVID-19 has inflicted on Canada’s long-term care system will motivate governments to finally fix all the problems that they have known about for years.
“It’s clear that the lives of people who are living in these homes are completely and totally undervalued,” said Candace Rennick of CUPE, the union representing 30,000 personal support workers in Ontario, many whom have staff jobs in care facilities.
“My father died in a facility recently – and it is a sad state of affairs,” Ms. Rennick said. “This crisis is not new. We have to do a better job for the people who are spending their last days there. Their lives matter.”
Apr 11, 2020
Posted on Apr 11, 2020 in Media Reports, National Listings, The Globe and Mail
Seniors’ care shouldn’t be a horror show even when the pandemic is over AndréPicard, The Globe and Mail
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-seniors-care-shouldnt-be-a-horror-show-even-when-the-pandemic-is/?utm_source
Note from Lise: Given the relevance and timeliness of this article, it appears below in its entirety.
Residents sitting in their own urine and feces because their continence pads had not been changed in days. Others dehydrated, starving and disoriented, having not been fed or given their medications. Two patients on the verge of death.
That’s the horror show public health inspectors found when they visited Résidence Herron, a 134-bed private long-term care facility in Dorval, Que. on March 29.
Now we know that there have been at least 31 deaths.
The details, first revealed by the Montreal Gazette, are sickening. The questions the incident raises profoundly troubling.
How is it possible that, in 2020, in Canada, that elders entrusted to a licensed care home can be treated worse than dogs at the city pound?
How is it conceivable that vulnerable seniors – some with dementia and severe mobility issues – could be left to fend for themselves? (There were only two orderlies left when inspectors arrived.)
And how can the managers of a corporation that boasts about offering its clients “luxury, comfort, convenience, security” be so crass that they would try to cover up the debacle? (Public health had to get a court order to get access to residents’ files and it was only then they learned there were 31 deaths.)
On Saturday, Quebec Premier François Legault, visibly shaken, said there had been “gross negligence” at the home and he has asked police to determine if criminal charges are warranted.
While this situation is egregious, it is sadly not unique.
Hundreds of nursing homes and seniors’ residences across Canada have been hit by outbreaks of coronavirus, often with deadly consequences.
The most publicized case is Pinecrest Nursing Home in Bobcaygeon, Ont., where 29 people have died so far.
But there are so many others that it’s hard to keep track.
At the Centre d’hébergement LaSalle there have been 20 deaths, and 19 at the CHLSD Ste-Dorothée.
All told, half of the almost 700 COVID-19 deaths in Canada have been in institutional settings.
More than a month ago, a deadly outbreak occurred at Lynn Valley Care Centre in North Vancouver (where 18 have now died) and it should have sounded an alarm that all seniors’ residences were at serious risk from the new coronavirus.
Yet, business continued more-or-less as usual, with homes restricting visitors and installing hand sanitizers, and isolating people only after they fell ill.
Essential safety measures like routine testing, banning work at multiple sites, and use of personal protective equipment have still have not been fully implemented
What the horror stories (and the data) tell us is that we should be testing every single person in institutional care, and isolating the infected aggressively. (Read: Not four to a room.)
Where routine testing has been done, the results are frightening; at CHLSD Ste-Dorothée, for example, 115 of the 174 residents have tested positive.
Both B.C. and Alberta have banned health care staff from working at multiple institutions, a common practice that allows the coronavirus to spread quickly.
This should be a permanent policy, not a temporary one.
There is no lack of work in nursing homes and long-term care. In fact, there are dire personnel shortages.
But many employers refuse to offer full-time work so they can avoid paying benefits. This forces staff, especially low-wage ones like personal support workers, to juggle shifts at various locations.
We can self-righteously denounce workers who abandoned their charges at places like Résidence Herron but who wants to put their life on the line for fifteen bucks an hour, no benefits – and no PPE?
COVID-19 is a disaster in seniors’ residences. But, more than anything else, it has exposed a crisis that already existed – a crisis of neglect for our elders.
Terrible food, one bath a week, over-medication, inadequate personal care like changing continence pads – all these complaints arise far too regularly in institutional care.
It shouldn’t take dozens or hundreds of deaths on top of that for us to finally be outraged.
The challenge – no, the moral imperative – now is not just get through the pandemic without much more carnage, but to deal with these issues permanently.
Nursing homes and long-term care homes are a necessity in modern society. There is a lot of good institutional care in this country.
But there is still far too much inadequate care, and that means the system needs a fundamental re-think.
